Search for: "MORRISON LAW GROUP PLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Securities laws were applicable under the transactional test in Morrison. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:01 am
The claim is a landmark group data protection action by 5,518 employees. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
The Court of Appeal’s decision Morrisons appealed the decision: Wm Morrisons Supermarket PLC v Various Claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 2339. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
In particular, the Court of Appeal appeared to have taken Lord Toulson’s comment in the case of Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc [2016] UKSC 11 that “motive is irrelevant” out of context. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
On 1 April 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down its ruling in WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:39 am
See In Re Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (Applying Morrison to dismiss both '33 and '34 Act claims by plaintiffs who purchased RBS shares on a non-U.S. exchange). [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:30 am
It is alleged that Dr Bates sexually assaulted the 126 claimants in this group action during their medical examinations. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm
Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
This was the trial of 10 lead cases in a group action by 5,518 employees of the supermarket chain WM Morrison Supermarkets PLC arising out of the disclosure of payroll data of 100,000 employees. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
Intech Group, Inc., 09 Civ. 9716 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
For the background to the case see: Inforrm, News: Morrisons found liable in landmark data protection group action. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am
Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:53 pm
- Florida attorney Santiago Cueto of Cueto Law Group on his blog International Business Law Advisor HGN - Are Police Officers Really Reporting What They See or What They Think Will Get a Conviction - Houston lawyer Dane Johnson of Johnson, Johnson & Baer, P.C. on their blog Houston DWI Law Blog How Green Is Your Stimulus--Year End Check In On Green Spending Under The ARRA - Philadelphia LEED AP Shari Shapiro on her Green Building Law… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) will hear the appeal in the data protection case of W M Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
Incidentally, the Supreme Court also decided WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants the same day in relation to vicarious liability arising out of an employee’s disclosure of employee data. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Rio Tinto plc, — F.4th –, 2022 WL 2760323, *6 (2d Cir. 2022). [30] Morrison v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
The UK Supreme Court Blog had a post “Case Preview: WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants” regarding Morrison’s appeal in a data breach claim brought by 5,500 employees. 5RB also had a piece. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
As already mentioned, on 26 February 2020, Nicol J heard the PTR in Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
